Loan Protection Insurance
A financial ombudsman has ruled that Barclays broke the ABI
code of practice and mis-sole expensive payment protection
insurance to a customer.
Barclays Bank has been ordered by the financial ombudsman
to compensate a customer who was mis-sold controversial loan
protection insurance.
And the ombudsman has slammed the bank for its failure “to
comply with the Association of British Insurers (ABI) code
of practice.”
In March, we revealed how Barclays made a 70% profit margin
on these insurances which have in the past accounted for some
10% of the bank’s global earnings. Other banks also
make large profits on these plans.
The near £7,000 compensation to Wiltshire resident
Maria Stengard-Green comes after a long Jobs & Money campaign
on her behalf.
Jobs & Money argued that the high-cost loan protection
insurance policy she bought alongside a Barclays loan was
inappropriate for her needs as she could not claim on many
sections of the plan because of her self-employed status.
Ms Stengard-Green also maintained she was told she could
not have a loan without buying the pricey loan protection
insurance cover – an assertion denied by Barclays but
now backed by the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Loan protection insurance cover should pay loan instalments
if the borrower loses income through injury, illness or unemployment.
The ombudsman decision against Barclays could open the floodgates
for many others to complain of being mis-sold loan protection
insurance policies.
Self-employed IT consultant Ms Stengard-Green took out a
£15,000 Barclayloan in 1999 for improvements at her
Marlborough home following a mailshot which said she has been
“pre-approved.”
The seven-year loan was priced at 13.9%. But she was told
she could only have it if she bought loan protection insurance.
The unwanted cover pushed up the monthly repayment from £275
to £358 – 30% more, adding some £7,000 over
the life of the loan and effectively raising the APR to 23%.
“The protection offered by the policy is useless,”
she says. “I was not told I have to go bankrupt before
I can claim on many sections.”
She realised how bad the loan protection insurance was when
she asked for another loan in 2002.
She asked Barclays for a refund. It refused. She went to
the ombudsman. She was turned down. Then she came to Job &
Money, which spent much time pleading with Barclays. To no
avail.
She tried the ombudsman again. Now the ombudsman says the
“key issue is whether she was given the option of taking
the loan without the loan protection insurance.”
Barclays claimed “it could not believe someone of Ms
Stengard-Green’s financial awareness could believe loan
protection insurance was mandatory.” It also cited her
cancellation rights.
But the cancellation issue, the ombudsman says, was “immaterial
as she was under the impression the loan was only agreed subject
to mandatory loan protection insurance. I have seen no evidence
Barclays offered the loan without the option of loan protection
insurance, that she was given any literature saying it was
optional, any quotation for a loan without loan protection
insurance, or that any discussion took place about the suitability
of a loan with loan protection insurance with reference to
any existing policies she held.”
Barclays was aware of her self-employed status. But it failed
to tell her she could only claim for unemployment in limited
circumstances such as bankruptcy.
The ABI code says the “suitability of a contract will
be explained to those who are unemployed or self-employed,
those on part-time work and those with pre-existing medical
conditions.”
The ombudsman concluded: “On the balance of probabilities,
she was mis-sold the loan protection insurance and not offered
the option of taking the loan without it. Even if the bank
had offered the loan without loan protection insurance, and
she had agreed to it of her own volition, I am of the view
the bank did not comply with the ABI code.”
The ombudsman has awarded her £6,907 including loan
protection insurance premium repayments, interest at 8%, and
£200 for her distress.
“I’m glad to settle this but I was prepared to
go to court,” says Ms Stengard-Green. “I shall
use the money to pay off the loan. But now I want a new loan
for further home improvements, so I rang a few banks and I
was only quoted deals with loan protection insurance. You
could hear them groan when I said I did not want a policy.”
Barclays Bank says: “We know that sales processes and
practices as well as customer service are areas in which we
should be constantly improving both in terms of the product
literature we offer to our customers and the training we give
to our staff.”
“For example, we were the first company to be accredited
by the GISC (General Insurance Standards Council) for training
and competence around selling general insurance products.”
|